



 


|
Non-Fictional
Prose
by
Charles G.D. Roberts
Edited
by D.M.R. Bentley and Laurel Boone
|
|
Introduction.*
|
|
In making my selections for this
volume of wild-life poems, I have taken no thought
for completeness. The scope of such a collection
might naturally be regarded as embracing the field
of earlier folk song—the verse produced by peoples
just emerging from barbarism; but for immediateness
of interest I have concerned myself in the main
with that characteristically modern verse which
is kindled where the outposts of an elaborate
and highly self-conscious civilization come in
contact with crude humanity and primitive nature.
The element of self-consciousness, I think, is
an essential one to this species of verse, which
delights us largely as affording a measure of
escape from the artificial to the natural. Such
escape is not to be achieved unless the gulf between
be bridged for us. This the poet effects by depicting
wild existence and untrammeled action in the light
of a continual consciousness of the difference
between such existence and our own. To have any
articulate message of enticement for our imaginations,
the life of the wilds must be brought into relation
with what we have experienced or conceived. We
must be able to imagine ourselves as thrown into
like situations, as confronted with like emergencies.
The action or the situation comes home to us through
the personality of such a one as ourselves, who
is thoroughly in touch with the life he is describing,
yet consciously belongs to a wider sphere. By
such medium the most remote phases of human existence,
the most unfamiliar aspects of the natural world,
are drawn easily within range of our sympathies.
Such
wild-life verse as this is essentially a product
of later days. The first waves of civilization
which, within the last century or two, washed
into the wilderness of the east and west, consisted
mainly of the pioneer element. These pioneers
were men wholly engrossed in action. After them
came some who fled from the weariness of the artificial
and the conventional, and who were able to give
imaginative expression to their delight in the
change. By a natural reaction, it is to the most
highly-developed society that such writings as
they produced make strongest appeal, restoring
confidence in the reality of the universal and
original impulses, and re-emphasizing the distinction
between the essentials and the accessories of
life. In the struggling civilizations which give
birth to them, however, these writings are apt
to be regarded with distaste. It is to the voice
from the drawing-room, rather, that the wilderness
hearkens, so the better to keep itself reminded
of the ideal toward which it works.
From
American writers, taking all in all, comes our
most abundant and distinctive wild-life verse—and
it is from English readers that this verse wins
its most cordial appreciation. The prince of all
wild-life poets is the "Poet of the Sierras,"
Joaquin Miller, an American of the Americans,
to whom the Old World hearkens with delight, but
whom the New World eyes askance. English critics
place Miller in the front rank of American singers.
American critics, on the other hand, though granting
him, not over willingly, a measure of genius,
will allow him no such standing as an equality
with Longfellow or with Lowell. The case illustrates
what I have suggested in a preceding paragraph.
Our civilization on this side the Atlantic has
not quite outgrown the remembrance of its early
struggles. The riper portions of America and Canada
have attained a degree of culture not distinguishable,
at its best, from that of the Old World; but we
are not yet satisfied that the Old World appreciates
this fact. We are so few generations from the
pioneer that his hard experiences have not yet,
to our eyes, put on the enchanting purples of
remoteness. We have a tendency to accentuate our
regard for culture, for smoothness, for conventionality;
and we sometimes betray a nervous apprehension
lest writings descriptive of the life on our frontiers
should be mistaken as descriptive of our own life.
Miller’s work, almost in its very defects, answered
to an Old World need. There, consequently, it
found fitting recognition. To New World life it
had less to give, outside of its purely poetic
qualities; and its faults were just such as the
New World civilization had been at such pains
to outgrow. Moreover, and worst of all, this work
was taken by the Old World as a typical New World
product, in which capacity, of course, it had
to be emphatically repudiated. In very truth,
the bizarre experiences which inspire such verse
as Miller’s, such prose as that of Bret Harte,
are as foreign to the typical American as to the
typical Englishman,—and much less to the former’s
liking.
The genius
of Miller is peculiarly fitted to bring this kind
of verse to perfection. By nature, by temperament,
he belongs to a self-conscious and long-established
society. He is continually analyzing himself in
others. He is always holding himself sufficiently
apart from his surroundings to be able to analyze
their savour to the full. At the same time, his
intense human sympathy keeps him in touch with
the subject of his observation; and a childhood
spent in his wild Oregon home, the associations
of his youth and early manhood among the turbulent
pioneers and miners of the Pacific coast, have
so indelibly impressed his genius, that the master-passions
alone, and those social problems only that are
of universal import, concern him when his singing
robes are on. There is thus a primitive sincerity
in his expression, and in his situations a perennial
interest. His passion is manly, fervent, wholesome;
and the frankness of it particularly refreshing
in these indifferent days. He is a lover of sonorous
rhythms, and betrays here and there in his lines
the enthralling cadences of Swinburne. But in
spite of such surface resemblances, he is fundamentally
as original as fresh inspiration, novel material,
and a strongly individualized genius might be
expected to make him. My excuse for singling out
the work of Joaquin Miller for special comment
is the fact that such poems as "With Walker
in Nicaragua," "Kit Carson’s Ride,"
"Arizonian," and many others for which
I would fain have found space, appear to me the
most characteristic work of their kind. They are
just such poems as our dilettante-ridden society
is in need of.
The active
romantic element present in all this wild-life
verse,— pre-eminently in the verse of Joaquin
Miller,—makes it of special significance to us
in these days, when poetry has become too much
a matter of technique,
too little a matter of inspiration. The saving
grace we moderns are apt to lack is that of a
frank enthusiasm. We are for ever lauding the
virtue of restraint, and expounding the profound
significance of repose. There has been so much
talk of the repose of conscious strength, that
one is apt to forget about the repose of conscious
weakness
"Calm’s
not life’s crown, though calm is well"
He is
but a little poet who dares not show himself moved.
The great ones, both of earlier and later days,
have been ready enough to throw off their repose
when they would exert their utmost strength. A
familiarity with the work of our wild-life singers
may bring question upon the modern poetic dogma
of justification by restraint. It may also assist,
not inappreciably, in that renascence of a true
romantic spirit, toward which some of our best
spirits look for the rejuvenation of our song.
Out of what is called Romanticism has arisen the
most stimulative poetry, the poetry for poets,
the poetry of Shakespeare and the Elizabethans,
of Chatterton, of Coleridge, of Keats. And the
quality of stimulation is that which the true
poet should desire above all else, even if at
the expense of the conservation of his verse.
The torch that conveys the light to a score of
waiting beacons, though its flame smoulder thereafter,
is not less worthy than the brightest and most
enduring of those signal-fires of whose incandescence
it was the parent. The elements of romance lie
thick in the life about us, but the tendency is
to ignore them lest we should seem to wear our
heart on our sleeve. An example of greater frankness
and sincerity may not be lost upon us.
Let me
not be misunderstood, however, as joining in the
present too common cry of critics, that our poetry
is in process of decadence. This age has still
singing for it rather more than its share of master-poets,
to whom it were the height of folly to imagine
that my talk of "the minds of the day,"
and "dilettantism," in any degree applied.
My words are of the young men from among whom
must come the masters of the future generation.
Among the young poets, with all their admirable
dexterity, there is a too general lack of romance,
of broad human impulse, of candid delight in life.
To them such verse as that of Miller and his fellows
contains a message of power.
The reader
will doubtless miss from this collection many
poems which he would have considered appropriate
to it. For some of these omissions it is quite
possible either my judgment or my knowledge may
be at fault. In certain cases, again, I have had
no choice. There are poems by Bayard Taylor, Bret
Harte, and others, which I greatly wished to include;
but the veto of the single firm of publishers
concerned intervened. Many fine poems, moreover,
I have thought well to omit as being already household
words. There is a large section of wild-life verse
which lies open to the charge of having been written
rather from reading than from experience. This
is but scantily represented. The literature of
America, about a generation back, was blossoming
most exuberantly with poems on the American Indian.
As a rule this work was not effective and the
little of it that was genuinely fine and strong
has become so hackneyed as to lie without any
purpose. The field of Australian song, whence
I thought to have gathered for my collection many
of its choicest and most distinctive ornaments,
has been pre-empted by Mr. Sladen in his Australian
Ballads and Rhymes,
a late predecessor of the present volume in the
series to which both belong. I am indebted to
Mr. Sladen, however, for having left to me the
picturesque and virile work of Mr. John Boyle
O’Reilly. To the living authors represented in
this collection I owe grateful acknowledgment
for the courteous and liberal assistance which
they have rendered me. To certain other poets,
not heroin represented, I make the opportunity
of expressing my thanks for a goodwill which is
none the less appreciated because the firm of
publishers already alluded to refused to second
it. I have also gratefully to record my obligations
to the following publishers, who were most generous
in granting me permission to select from their
copyright works:—
Messrs. Charles Scribner &
Sons, D. Appleton & Co., Tricknor & Co.,
S.C. Griggs & Co. |
"Introduction,"
Poems of Wild Life, ed. Charles G.D.
Roberts (London: Walter Scott; Toronto: Gage,
1888), ix-xviii [back]
|
|
|
|
|
|