Eden. By Edgar
Saltus. [1888] New York and Chicago: Belford,
Clark & Co.
The Black Arrow.
By Robert Louis Stevenson. [1888] New York: Charles
Scribner’s Sons.
Looking Backward.
By Edward Bellamy. Boston: [1888] Ticknor &
Co.
These
are a part of the cream of recent fiction, and
the selection of them for notice means that they
are eminently noteworthy. Eden
is another of those
brief but almost flawless studies from New York
life which Mr. Saltus has taught us to expect
from his pen. As was the case with Tristrem
Varick, the literary workmanship is something
which the critic can only hold up as an example
to the host of fiction- producers. Mr. Saltus
is an artist in words. This story contains no
piece of prose of such loveliness as the paraphrase
from Flaubert in Tristrem Varick, but every
page is a tissue of scintillations. The story
is slight in plot, and rigidly condensed. It can
be read at a sitting,—and is likely to be, as
it has no convenient place to pause at. The conclusion
is in striking contrast with that of Tristrem
Varick, in that it is
altogether satisfactory and non-pessimistic. It
is not in all respects such a work as one would
recommend for a Sunday school library, and nevertheless
I think it is a thoroughly wholesome book for
adult readers. Its central figure is a very beautiful
creation, a woman whose purity and perfect refinement
are as native to her as her breath,—a woman who
is able to maintain her chivalrous ideals, and
who sees the triumph of them, in the midst of
a pessimistically cynical and worldly-wise society.
The work is a realistic study of a phase of New
York life, and shows the good and evil alike,—but
the good much predominating, and in every way
the more attractive and effectual. The pen portraits
from New York society have a biting definiteness
of outline which will keep them forever recognizable.
Every stroke tells, and no stroke superfluous.
It would be interesting to know whom Mr. Saltus
intends by his portrait of "Mrs. Smithwick,
the bride of a month, fairer than that queen whose
face was worth the world to kiss, and who the
previous winter had written a novel of such impropriety
that when it was published her mother forbade
her to read it." The delineation is one much
to be regretted at the present time, when it is
liable to be grossly misapplied. The most important
blemish of the book, it seems to me, is to be
found in the interview between Eden and her father,
when Eden, in a fit of causeless jealousy, has
left her husband. Mr. Menemon makes an admission
to his daughter which may mean much and may mean
little. Ambiguity is often a potent factor, but
in this case it seems to me a distinct weakness.
The point to which I take exception will be at
once apparent to readers of the work
Mr.
Stevenson is a master of style, with the finish
of Mr. Saltus and a vastly wider variety, both
of theme and treatment. The
Black Arrow is a book
that old and young alike should read. Boys might
educate themselves upon it, as upon Robinson
Crusoe. It is a story of adventure, set amid
the Wars of the Roses, and overflows with excitement
and incident and life. A bit of a love story,
contrary to Mr. Stevenson’s custom, runs through
the tale, greatly to the satisfaction of us poor
mortals, who cannot forget how large apart of
life is love. The love story is wholesome, tender,
unsentimental, and, duly or unduly, subordinated
to everything else! I believe Mr. Stevenson would
have left it out altogether, if he could; but
it was essential as an inspiration to some of
the doughty deeds he so loves to depict. It seems
superfluous to praise Mr. Stevenson, who makes
a new departure with every new work, and finds
no rival but himself. I can only say of The
Black Arrow, that whoever
has not read it yet is fortunate. He has an attainable
delight before him.
Mr.
Bellamy’s book seems somewhat out of place among
those of Mr. Saltus and Mr. Stevenson. It is a
"novel with a purpose;" and the novel
disappears beneath the purpose. In fact, I think
it is a virtuous fraud to call the work a novel.
The delusive title may mislead many an unsuspecting
reader into an acquaintance with noble and humane
ideas which he would have otherwise been able
to avoid. They are such ideas as many of us strenuously
desire to avoid, lest an insufficiently toughened
conscience should find their contact painful.
Mr. Bellamy, like Plato and Sir Thomas More, and
some others who were not without consideration
in their day, does not regard the accepted social
order as a creation sprung perfect from the brain
of God. In fact, he is one of those daring innovators
who think that human happiness might be more evenly
and fairly distributed than it is at present.
Yet Mr. Bellamy is not in sympathy with Herr Most!
The book is written with great practicality and
deep earnestness. The thread of the story, though
slight, ingeniously interesting, so that it is
a mind of very small calibre that could find the
work unreadable. Thoughtful men and women, who
are concerned with the social problems of the
day—as who are not—can afford to think long over
this novel.